The Early Iron Age in Gamla Uppsala has never been a prominent field of research. The aim of this article is to survey known Early Iron Ages settlements in Gamla Uppsala. Special attention is paid to the agrarian environment and land use,...
moreThe Early Iron Age in Gamla Uppsala has never been a prominent field of research. The aim of this article is to survey known Early Iron Ages settlements in Gamla Uppsala. Special attention is paid to the agrarian environment and land use, possible changes and reasons for these changes. This is an attempt to find a more comprehensive perspective. The different settlements are characterised. Thereafter, traces of agrarian activity are discussed in terms of the local agrarian environment and its utilisation, manifested by finds of animal bones, macrofossil, traces of activities and other finds. Agrarian remains form the basis of a discussion on the agrarian environment and its use. In Gamla Uppsala, the settlement expansion, established in particular at Bredåker at the onset of the Pre-Roman Iron Age, and correlating in time with a regionally intensified land use and land preparation, can be linked to the so called agro-technical complex of the Early Iron Age. Agrarian activities and land use have manifested themselves by cereal cultivation, mainly barley. Fields would have surrounded the most extensive settlements at Bredåker and Berget, while pastures would have been located outside the cultivated lands. From the Later Pre-Roman Iron Age until the Migration Period there was intense animal husbandry, including winter stabling, hay-making on the lowlands along the marsh meadows of the Samnan valley. During the period, the number of houses per farm, as well as the house dimensions, increases. This is particularly true of the outhouses, even if the number of farms seems to be the same. This can be seen as signs of concentration and rationalisation of the cultivation system. The increase of house size can be indicative of the increased storage capacity of the households, probably due to an agrarian overproduction, brought about by fees and tributes. Finally, the way in which Iron Age settlement should be understood, in terms of social status and hierarchies, is discussed. In my opinion, there are
indications of an adjustment to local natural conditions in terms of land use and agrarian systems. The settlement location can be said to reflect the right of disposition of the land, and thus also the power structure. During the Early Roman Iron Age, a new power structure can be discerned, manifested by a new form of settlement in pronounced locations. Probably, these settlements exercised some form of control over other settlements, albeit a local level. Their function could be to collect tax and redistribute goods, but they also had an agrarian production of their own. During the Late Roman Iron Age, even more extravagant topographical locations were chosen for settlement, and the buildings grew larger and were constructed in different ways. The function of this kind of farmstead might be to redistribute produce, but cult practices cannot be ruled out. During the Migration Period, the farmsteads of the central settlement might have increased in size. Later on, a craft centre was established in the area between Gamla Uppsala School and the parish church. Around the same time, the eastern and western mounds were erected.